Original Articles
1 January 2021
Vol. 43 No. 1 (2021)

Return to work after breast cancer: barriers and facilitators

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
61
Views
62
Downloads

Authors

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed neoplasm among women. The incremental advantages obtained in terms of survival make it possible to consider this disease as a chronic disease. Furthermore, the increasing impact on working-age women associated with the increase in the retirement age raises the question of return to work (RTW). Adequate work reintegration is important from a psychological, economic and social point of view. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors implicated in the RTW of women diagnosed with breast cancer according to recent scientific literature. The factors involved in returning to work after breast cancer are classifiable in socio-demographic, medical-clinical, occupational, psychosocial, cognitive and physical activityrelated factors. Among these the most cited are the medicalclinical (treatments, type of cancer, disease-related consequences), work-related (support from colleagues and supervisors, characteristics of work and the workplace) and psychosocial (social support, depression, anxiety) factors. The results obtained allow to have some indications for planning return to work interventions after breast cancer. Future studies are needed to distinguish the implication of factors at each stage of the RTW process in order to plan successful RTW interventions.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite



Return to work after breast cancer: barriers and facilitators. (2021). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 43(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.402