Original Articles
17 February 2025
Vol. 42 No. 4 (2020)

EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENT OF THE ‘PAR’ OF SEVEN EAR PLUGS

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
28
Views
12
Downloads

Authors

The study aimed to evaluate, through the use of the EA-RfitT M Validation System, the real reduction (PAR) for the right ear (AuD), for the left ear (AuS) and biaural reduction related to each of the seven earplugs currently produced by 3M. In addition, we wanted to verify any difference between the aforementioned PARs in consideration of the tendency to predominantly use the right hand (right-handed) or the left hand (left-handed) and in relation to gender. Finally, for each insert and for each subject, an audiometric examination was conducted with the insert worn, to compare the average PAR value obtained by the BA-RfilM system for each of the seven inserts and for all selected subjects, with the determined abatement curve through the audiometric measurement of the hearing threshold with the insert worn. The use of the E-ARfitiM system for the choice of the ear insert leads to important advantages in the protection of all workers. Moldable acoustic PPE generally proved to be more efficient than non-moldable, so much so that the higher SNRs (provided by the manufacturer), especially when referring to non-moldable inserts, were found to be misleading as to the real personal abatement capacity of the inserts. The average audiometric curves, obtained with the different inserts worn, confirmed that all of them guarantee a higher reduction for high frequencies than for "social" ones.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) D.Lgs. n. 81 del 9 aprile 2008. Testo Unico sulla salute e sicurezza sul lavoro. Pubblicato su G.U. n. 101 del 30 aprile 2008, S.O. n. 108. 2) Norma UNI EN 24869-1: 1993 [ISO 4869-1: 1990J. Metodo soggettivo per la misura dell'attenuazione sonora.
3) Berger EH. Assessment of the performance of hearing protectors for hearing conservation purposes. Noise & Vibration Control Worldwide 1984; 15(3): 75-81.
4) Berger EH, Voix J, Kieper RW, Le Cocq C. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation. Noise Health 2011; 13(51): 163-175. 5) Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Johnson JL, Harris DA. Four earplugs in search of a rating system. Ear Hear 2000; 21(3): 218-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.77214
6) Galbiati C. Dispositivi di protezione individuale: considerazioni sui requisiti e sulle caratteristiche di scelta ed uso. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2010; 32: 259-262.
7) Huttunen KH, Sivonen VP, Poykko VT. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods. Noise Health 2011; 13(51): 176-188. 8) Merluzzi F, Di Credico N. Determinazione dei criteri per la scelta e la utilizzazione dei mezzi personali di protezione acustica. Med Lav 1993; 84(2): 162-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.77210
9) Neitzel R, Somers S, Seixas N. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements. Ann Occup Hyg 2006; 50(7): 679-691.
10) Nelisse H, Gaudreau MA, Boutin J, et al. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations. Ann Occup Hyg 2012; 56(2): 221-232.
11) Perbellini L, Veronese N, Raineri E, Rava M, Riolfi A. Ipoacusia da rumore: I programmi di sorveglianza sanitaria sono sempre efficaci? Med Lav 2009; 100: 20-23.
12) UNI 9432: 2008, Acustica - Determinazione del livello di esposizione personale al rumore nell'ambiente di lavoro, giugno 2008.
13) Peretti A, Pedrielli F, Pasqua di Bisceglie A, Bonomini F. Valutazione dell'adeguatezza dei dispositivi individuali di protezione uditiva. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2010; 32: 267-270.
14) Cassano F, Aloise I, Labianca G, Gaccione V, Mazzotta C, Cardascia F, Garavaglia M, Scarselletta RS, Di Lorenzo L. La misura del reale abbattimento soggettivo di rumore con uso di inserti auricolari tramite sistema E-A-RfitTM. Med Lav 2013; 104(3): 213-223.
15) Custom Protect Ear. How do you find out what hearing protection you have? Are FAES the answer? Disponibile online all'indirizzo: http: //www.protectear.com/, consultato in data 4 marzo 2015. 16) Cassano F, Aloise I, Labianca G, Gaccione V, Mazzotta C, Cardascia F, Garavaglia M, Germano C, Dentamaro A, Di Lorenzo L. Il peso di informazione e formazione dei lavoratori sul corretto utilizzo di inserti auricolari nella valutazione del reale abbattimento del rumore mediante il sistema E-A-RfitTM, Med Lav 2015; 106, 4: 284-293.
17) Norma UNI EN 458: 1995 (rev. 2005). Raccomandazioni per la selezione, l'uso, la cura e la manutenzione dei protettori auricolari. 18) Cassano F, Elia G. Possibilità e limiti della protezione acustica in esposti a rumori industriali. Riv Med Lav Ig Ind 1983; 7: 28.
19) Cassano F, Elia G. Possibilità e limiti della protezione acustica individuale: gli inserti auricolari. Riv Med Lav Ig Ind 1984; 8: 95.

How to Cite



EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENT OF THE ‘PAR’ OF SEVEN EAR PLUGS. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 42(4), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.464