Original Articles
17 February 2025
Vol. 41 No. 1 (2019)

Assessment of functional status and rehabilitative strategies in occupational therapy: role of the Groningen Activity Restriction Questionnaire

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
48
Views
21
Downloads

Authors

Background and Purpose. The Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) is a self-reported non-diseasespecific instrument for measuring patients' disability in Activity of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL). In literature, several studies have demonstrated high psychometric properties of GARS for disability assessment.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of GARS administered and scored by the occupational therapists, rather than self-reported by the patient, as a tool for measuring disability in adult patients treated with occupational therapy. Methods. A inter-operator reliability and correlation study was conducted among 31 people (mean age 70.6+13.1 years), admitted to inpatient Occupational Therapy rehabilitation service of ICS Maugeri, Pavia, from May through September 2018. ADL and IADL dependency indices were measured with GARS, which was assessed by three independent occupational therapists during admission of patients to occupational therapy rehabilitation service. Other measures included demographic characteristics and healthcare resource utilization.
Therefore, a single occupational therapist performed a second evaluation of patient's performance using GARS at the discharge from treatment, in order to identify any changes in patient's functional abilities after rehabilitation treatment; the results obtained were compared with those detected by the functional independence measures (FIM). Statistical analysis was conducted by Cohen's k coefficient and Pearson's p correlation coefficient. Results. The statistical analysis showed a discrete reliability and responsiveness of GARS (Coen's k = 0.531), due to a moderate correlation between GARS and FIM instruments (Pearson's p = 0.359) for evaluating the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions.
Conclusions. Even if conducted by occupational therapists, GARS is a useful tool for measuring disability in ADL and IADL, which can help clinicians to develop a customized plan of care in occupational therapy, improving patient's management and clinical outcome.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) World Federation of Occupational Therapy. Definitions of occupational therapy, draft 7. August 2005.
2) American Occupational Therapy Association. Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2014; 68(Suppl 1): S1-S48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006 3) Bazzini G, Panigazzi M, Boveri N, et al. Nuovi sviluppi in terapia occupazionale ed ergonomia. Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia 2007; 29(1): 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.68S1
4) Piergrossi JC. Essere nel fare. Introduzione alla terapia occupazionale, Modelli di pratica professionale. Franco Angeli, Milano, 2006. 5) Bazzini G, Panigazzi M, Prestifilippo E, et al. Role of occupational rehabilitation therapy in patients' return to work: experimental experiences. 2014.
6) SPREAD, Stroke Prevention and Educational Awareness Diffusion. Ictus cerebrale: Linee guida italiane. Catel Hyperphar Group Spa, Milano, 2007.
7) Imbriani M, Bazzini G, Franchignoni F. Argomenti di Terapia Occupazionale. Volume II, "Le scale di misura il T.O.", ', Aracne Edit. Roma, 2007.
8) Kempen GIM, Miedema 1, et al. The assessment of disability with the Groningen activity restriction scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine 1996, 43(11): 1601-1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00057-3
9) Suurmeijer TP, Doeglas DM, et al. The Groningen activity restriction scale for measuring disability: Its utility in international comparisons. American Public Health Association 1994; 84(8): 1270-1273 10) Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, editori. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1965.
11) Nagi SZ. Disability concepts revisited: implications for prevention. In: Pope AM, Tarlow AR, editors. Disability in America: toword a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
12) Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA September 1963; 185: 914-919 JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 185(12):914-919. DOI: 10.1001/jama. 1963.03060120024016 13) Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of Older People: SelfMaintaining and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179, 14) Gimigliano F, Riccio I, D'Avanto C, et al. Validazione di un questionario breve derivato dalla GARS per misurare la disabilità nelle ADL nel soggetto anziano. Ottobre 2008.
15) Caracciolo A, Redaelli T, Valsecchi L. Terapia occupazionale - ausili e metodologie per l'autonomia. Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2008.

How to Cite



Assessment of functional status and rehabilitative strategies in occupational therapy: role of the Groningen Activity Restriction Questionnaire. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 41(1), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.491