Original Articles
18 February 2025
Vol. 41 No. 2 (2019)

The ICD-ICF clinical model of hospital care

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
25
Views
17
Downloads

Authors

Because of the demographic shift and the increased proportion of patients surviving acute critical illnesses, the number of people living with severely disabling chronic diseases and, consequently, the demand for rehabilitation are expected to increase sharply overtime. As underscored by the World Health Organization (WHO), there is substantial evidence that the provision of inpatient rehabilitation in specialized rehabilitation units to people with complex needs is effective in fostering functional recovery, improving health-related quality of life, increasing independence, reducing institutionalization rate, and improving prognosis. Recent studies in the real-world setting reinforce the evidence that patients with ischemic heart disease or stroke benefit from rehabilitation in terms of improved prognosis.
In addition, there is evidence of the effectiveness of rehabilitation for the prevention of functional deterioration in patients with complex and/or severe chronic diseases.
Given this evidence of effectiveness, rehabilitation should be regarded as an essential part of the continuum of care (transitional care). Nonetheless, rehabilitation still is underdeveloped and underused. A new model based on ICD and ICF WHO disease and disfunctioning classification respectively and on pre-set clinical pathways is described. The aim of this model is to optimize clinical care in times of shortage of resources and huge increase in older chronic multi morbid patients.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) European Commission (2011): Strategic Implementation Plan for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Steering Group Working Document, Final text adopted by the Steering Group on 7/11/11, Strategic Plan.
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ 2) The Online Repository of Innovative Practices in Active and Healthy Ageing is live on the EIP on AHA portal: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/repository_en] 3) https://ec. europa.eu/eip/ageing/blueprint_en, consultato il 9 maggio 2019.
4) Shortell SM. Applying Organization Theory to Understanding the Adoption and Implementation of Accountable Care Organizations: Commentary. Medical Care Research and Review 2016; 73(6): 694-702. 5) Burke RE, Cumbler E, Coleman EA, Levy C. Post-Acute Care Reform: Implications and Opportunities for Hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017; 12: 46-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558716643477
6) Graham JE, Prvu Bettger J, Middleton A, Spratt H, Sharma G, Ottenbacher KJ. Effects of Acute-Postacute Continuity on Community Discharge and 30-Day Rehospitalization Following Inpatient Rehabilitation. Health Serv Res 2017; 52(5): 1631-1646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12678
7) Lynch EA, Cadilhac DA, Luker JA, Hillier SL. Inequities in access to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: an international scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2017; 24(8): 619-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2017.1366010
8) Abreu A, Pesah E, Supervia M, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation availability and delivery in Europe: How does it differ by region and compare with other high-income countries? European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 2019; 2047487319827453.
9) McWilliams JM, Gilstrap LG, Stevenson DG, et al. Changes in Postacute Care in the Medicare Shared Savings Program JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177(4): 518-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9115
10) Spiroski D, Andjié M, Stojanovié OI, et al. Very short/short-term benefit of inpatient/outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Clin Cardiol 2017; 40(5): 281-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22656
11) Buhagiar MA, Naylor JM, Harris IA, et al. Effect of Inpatient Rehabilitation vs a Monitored Home-Based Program on Mobility in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty: The HIHO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 317(10): 1037-1046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1224
12) Frank F, Bjerregaard F, Bengel J, et al. Local, collaborative, stepped and personalised care management for older people with chronic diseases (LoChro): study protocol of a randomised comparative effectiveness trial. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1088-0
13) http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ consultato il 5 maggio 2019.
14) Stucki G, Zampolini M, Juocevicius A, Negrini S, Christodoulou N. Practice, science and governance in interaction: European effort for the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health(ICF) in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 299-307. 15) EscorpizoR, Bemis-DoughertyA. Introduction to special issue: A review of the international classification of functioning, disability and health and physical therapy over the years. Physiother Res Int 2015; 20: 200-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.16.04436-1
16) Pires JM, Ferreira AM, Rocha F, et al. Assessment of neurogenic bowel dysfunction impact after spinal cord injury using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2018; 54(6): 873-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.18.04991-2
17) LiK, Yan T, You L, Xie S, Li Y, Tang J, et al. Psychometric properties of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health set forspinal cord injury nursing based on Rasch analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40: 338-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1250169
18) Giardini A, Pisoni C, Giorgi I, Borelli V, Scoccia E, Majani G. ICF, quality of life, and depression in breast cancer: perceived disability in disease-free women 6 months after mastectomy. Support Care Cancer 2013: 21(9): 2453-2460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1794-7
19) Ezekiel L, Collett J, Mayo NE, Pang L, Field L, Dawes H. Factors Associated with Participation in Life Situations for Adults With Stroke: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May; 100(5): 945-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.017
20) Giardini A, Ferrari P, Negri E M, Majani G, Magnani C, Preti P. The positive role of care givers in terminal cancer patients' abilities: usefulness of the ICF framework. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2016; 52: 214-22.
21) Kohler F, Connolly C, Sakaria A, Stendara K, Buhagiar M, Mojaddidi M. Can the ICF be used as a rehabilitation outcome measure? A study looking at the inter-and intra-rater reliability of ICF categories derived from an ADL assessment tool. J Rehabil Med 2013: 45: 881-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1194
22) Okochi J, Utsunomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: Test retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-3-46
23) Hilfiker R. Obrist S. Christen G. Lorenz T. Cieza A. The use of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for low back pain in clinical practice: A reliability study. Physiother Res Int 2009; 1 4: 147-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.436
24) Connolly B. Describing and measuring recovery and rehabilitation after critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2015; 21: 445-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000233
25) Lexell J, Brogärdh C. The use of ICF in the neuro rehabilitation process. NeuroRehabilitation 2015; 36: 5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-141184
26) Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed with in the ICF. Disabil Rehabil 2017: 39: 1364-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
27) Xiong T, Bunning K, Horton S, Hartley S. Assessing and comparing the outcome measures for the rehabilitation of adults with communication disorders in randomised controlled trials: An International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Health Approach. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 2272-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.568666
28) Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar; 41(5): 574-583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258
29) Fayed N,Cieza A,Bickenbach JE. Linking health and health-related information to the ICF: A systematic review of the literature from 2001 to 2008. Disabil Rehabil 2011: 33: 1941-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.553704
30) Huber EO, Tobler A, Gloor-Juzi T, Grill E, Gubler-Gut B. The ICF as a way to specify goals and to assess the outcome of physiotherapeutic interventions in the acute hospital. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 174-7. 31) https://www.icf-core-sets.org. Consultato il 9 ottobre 2018 32) Prodinger B, Reinhardt J, Selb M, et al. Towards system wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in routine practice: Developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF Generic and Rehabilitation Set. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 508-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2066
33) Maini M, Nocentini U, Prevedini A, Giardini A, Muscolo E. An Italian experience in the ICF implementation in rehabilitation: preliminary theoretical and practical considerations. Disabil Rehabil 2008: 30: 1146-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701478397
34) Reinhardt JD, Zhang X, Prodinger B, et al. Towards the system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in routine clinical practice: Empirical findings of a pilot study from Mainland China. J Rehabil Med 2016; 48: 515-21. 35) Martinuzzi A, Carraro E, Petacchi E, Pasqualotti S, Costalunga M, Betto S. Implementation of an ICF-based project / program in a pediatric neuro - rehabilitation hospital: follow-up evaluation by stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1059-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.720347
36) Giardini A, Traversoni S, Garbelli C, Lodigiani A. Digitalisation and clinical care pathways in rehabilitation medicine: a possible integration from the goal - planning and the rehabilitation programme design to the evaluation of clinical outcomes. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2018; 40: 22-9.
37) Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017; 53: 134-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04565-8
38) Hopfe M, Stucki G, Marshall R, Twomey CD, Ustün TB, Prodinger B. Capturing patients' needs in casemix: A systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems. BMC Health Serv Res 2016 Feb 3; 16: 40. 39) Madden R, Marshall R, Race S. ICF and case mix models for health care funding: Use of the WHO family of classifications to improve case mix. Disabil Rehabil 2013; 35: 1074-977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.720349
40) Selb M, Kohler F, Robinson Nicol MM, et al. ICD11: A comprehensive picture of health, an update on the ICD-ICF joint use initiative. J Rehabil Med 2015; 47: 2-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1928
41) Giorgi G. Chronic patient and a circular care-related prevention - treatment - rehabilitation model. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2018; 40: 6-21.
42) Kannampallil TG, Schauer GF, Cohen T, Patel VL. Considering complexity in health care systems. J Biomed Inform 2011; 44: 943-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.06.006
43) Turner P, Kushniruk A, Nohr C. Are we there yet? Human factors knowledge and health information technology-The challenges of implementation and impact. Yearb Med Inform 2017; 26: 84-91. 44) Decreto ministeriale 12 dicembre 2017: definizione e aggiornamento dei livelli essenziali di assistenza. Gazzetta Ufficiale 17 marzo 2017. 45) Determinazioni in ordine ai requisiti di accreditamento per le attività riabilitative. Deliberazione regione Lombardia X/1520 del 20.03.2014 46) Haendel MA, Chute CG, Robinson PN. Classification, Ontology, and Precision Medicine. New Engl J Med 379 (15): 1452-1462. 47) Giorgi G, Migliavacca P. La svolta digitale in ospedale: una sfida organizzativa. Il caso dell'organizzazione del comparto palestre riabilitative. G Ital Med Lav Ergon, Vol. XL, 2018 Suppl. al N. 1, Gen-Mar.
48) Mans RS, Van der Aalst WMP, Vanwersch RJP. Process Mining in Healthcare: Evaluating and Exploiting Operational Healthcare Processes. Springer; ISBN: 9783319160702 49) Prodinger B, Stucki G, Coenen M, Tennant A, on behalf of the ICF INFO Network (2017). The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments. Disability and Rehabilitation, Disabil Rehabil 2019 Mar; 41(5): 541-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186
50) Spanevello A, Garbelli C, Giorgi G. Piano della cronicità e cure correlate. IHPB - Italia Health Policy Brief 2016; ALTIS Omnia Pharma Service, Anno VI - N° 3.

How to Cite



The ICD-ICF clinical model of hospital care. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 41(2), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.493