ATTI 82° CONGRESSO NAZIONALE SIML
18 February 2025
Vol. 41 No. 4 (2019)

[Health and safety risks in seaport work: update of the narrative literature review]

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
36
Views
12
Downloads

Authors

Seaports are complex systems in which workers can be exposed to a large variety of safety and health risks. Nevertheless, a little literature is available concerning this topic, if we exclude the specific area of shipbuilding industry.
Objectives. The aim of this paper is to update the review of the scientific literature previously published as result of a project concerning the occupational risks in seaports.
Methods. Literature on this theme, obtained consulting the main databases (PubMed, Scholar and CCOHS) from 2012 and up to April 2019, was reviewed.
Results. Five of eight articles published after 2012 were related to risk of release or formation of volatile compounds in restricted and poorly ventilated areas or inhalation of particles from specific goods. Three papers specifically debated musculoskeletal disorders related to loading unloading procedures, occupational diseases and injuries.
Conclusions. The update of the literature highlighted intrinsically dangerous goods, toxic volatile compounds and emissions as critical aspects of seaport activities related to goods handling. Recently, the literature shows a growing interest in occupational health, especially work-related musculoskeletal diseases. Prevention measures and implementation of worker's training and information are identified by all authors as the more effective action to increase health and safety.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) Barbieri A, Sabatini L, Graziosi F, et al. Occupational safety and health risks in dock work: a narrative literature review. Med Lav 2014; 105(6): 413-34.
2) Baur X, Budnik LT, Zhao Z, et al. Health risks in international container and bulk cargo transport due to volatile toxic compounds. J Occup Med Toxicol 2015; 20: 10-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-015-0059-4
3) Svedberg U, Johanson G. Work inside ocean freight containerspersonal exposure to off-gassing chemicals. Ann Occup Hyg 2013; 57(9): 1128-37.
4) Svedberg U, Johanson G. Occurrence of fumigants and hazardous off-gassing chemicals in shipping containers arriving in Sweden. Ann Work Expo Health 2017; 61(2): 195-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxw022
5) Sundal MK, Lilleng PK, Barane H, et al. Asphyxiation death caused by oxygen-depleting cargo on a ship. Forensic Sci Int 2017; 279: e7-9. 6) Gasperazzo A, Toffanin P, Larese Filon F. Green coffee been exposure and symptoms in dock workers in Trieste (Italy). Med Lav 2017; 108(5): 349-57. 7) de Carvalho MP, Schmidt LG, Soares MC. Musculoskeletal disorders and their influence on the quality of life of the dockworker: a cross-sectional study. Work 2016; 53(4): 805-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.024
8) Almeida MC, Cezar-Vaz MR, Soares JF, et al. The prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases among casual dock workers. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2012; 20(2): 243-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692012000200005
9) Cezar-Vaz MR, de Almeida MC, Bonow CA, et al. Casual dock work: profile of diseases and injuries and perception of influence on health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11(2): 2077-91. 10) Puntoni R, Ceppi M, Casella C, et al. Increased incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma among longshoremen in Genoa, Italy: the role of sunlight and occupational exposure. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62(4): 270-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.018374

How to Cite



[Health and safety risks in seaport work: update of the narrative literature review]. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 41(4), 293-298. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.509