ATTI 82° CONGRESSO NAZIONALE SIML
25 September 2019
Vol. 41 No. 4 (2019)

[Suitability for work in the heart patient: assessing physical and psycho-social risks]

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
40
Views
72
Downloads

Authors

Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death and disability in all industrialized countries, including Italy. Advances in acute phase treatment and increasingly effective rehabilitation programs have determined higher survival rates and a subsequent rise in disease prevalence in working age population. Hence the need for implementing social reintegration programs, including interventions aimed specifically at aiding the process of returning to work, in which the occupational physician plays a crucial role by means of assessing the compatibility between the workers residual clinical and functional capabilities and the characteristics of their job profile. On the basis of recent literature data, particular attention must be paid to occupational risks towards which cardiopathic patients are particularly susceptible, i.e. environmental risks (physical effort), organizational and psycho-social risks (workload and time pressure, shifts, job demand and control). A close collaboration between the occupation physician and the cardiologist to ensure an effective return to work process is highly recommended, as well as periodic re-evaluations of job placement adequacy that can also include clinical examinations, performed during working hours, of the degree of cardiovascular adaptation to working conditions.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, et al. European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2018; 39(7): 508-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx628
2) Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update. Eur Heart 2016; J 37: 3232-3245. 3) Stendardo M, Bonci M, Casillo V, et al. Predicting return to work after acute myocardial infarction: Socio-occupational factors overcome clinical conditions. PLOS ONE 2018; 13(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208842
4) Borchini R, Ferrario MM. Heart disease and work: from rehabilitation to return to work. Med Lav 2010; 101(2): 50-6.
5) Wassermann K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, Stringer WW, Whipp BJ. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. Lippicott Williams & Wilkins 4th Editino 2005.
6) Cohn JN, Johnson GR, Shabetai R, et al. Ejection fraction, peak exercise oxygen consumption, cardiothoracic ratio, ventricular arrhythmias, and plasma norepinephrine as determinants of prognosis in heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation 1993; 87(6): VI 5-16.
7) Peterson ED, Shaw Lu, Califf RM. Risk stratification after Myocardial Infarction Ann Intern Med 1997; 1, 126(7): 561-582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-7-199704010-00012
8) Gibbons RJ, Miller TD. Noninvasive risk stratification after myocardial infarction: new evidence, new questions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48(12): 2468-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.029
9) Talmage JB, Melhorn JM, Hyman MH. Work ability and return to work. American Medical Association 2011; 2nd Edition.
10) Scafa F, Calsamiglia G, Tonini S, et al. Return to work after coronary angioplasty or heart surgery: a 5-year experience with the "Cardio Work" protocol. Occup Environ Med 2012; 54(12): 1545-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182677d54
11) Koeheler K, Drenowatz C. Monitoring Energy Expenditure Using a Multi-Sensor Device-Applications and Limitations of the Sense Wear Armband in Athletic Populations. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00983
12) Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1977.
13) Cotes JE, Zejda J, King B. Lung function impairment as a guide to exercise limitation in work-related lung disorders. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 137: 1089-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1089
14) Haskell W, Brachfeld N, Bruce RA, et al. Task Force II: determination of occupational working capacity in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14(4): 1025-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(89)90485-3
15) Mc Cunney RJ: A practical approach to occupational and environmental medicine. Ed Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 3ra edition. 2003. 16) Kristensen TS. Cardiovascular diseases and the work environment. A critical review of epidemiological literature on nonchemical factors. Scan J Work Envion Health 1989; (15): 2245-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1864
17) Yang Y, Zhang E, Zang Jet al. Relationship between occupational noise exposure and the risk factors of cardiovascular disease in China A meta-analysis. Medicine 2018; 97): 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011720
18) Kivimäki M, Kawachi I. Work Stress as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015; 17(9): 630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-015-0630-8
19) Ferrario MM, Veronesi G, Bertù L, Grassi G, Cesana G. Job strain and the incidence of coronary heart diseases: does the association differ among occupational classes? A contribution from a pooled analysis of Northern Italian cohorts. BMJ Open 2017; 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014119
20) Veronesi G, Borchini R, Landsbergis P, et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention at the workplace: assessing the prognostic value of lifestyle risk factors and job-related conditions. Int J Public Health 2018 Jul; 63(6): 723-732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1118-2
21) Dragano N, Siegrist J, Nyberg ST, et al. Effort-Reward Imbalance at Work and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Multicohort Study of 90,164 Individuals. Epidemiol 2017; 28(4): 619-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000666

How to Cite



[Suitability for work in the heart patient: assessing physical and psycho-social risks]. (2019). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 41(4), 341-343. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.519