Original Articles
20 February 2025
Vol. 40 No. 2 (2018)

[Psychosocial well-being in school contexts: a case study analysis using the Va.RP tool]

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
20
Views
39
Downloads

Authors

Introduction. The organizational well-being construct has become a theme with broad scientific and law debate, pertaining prevention and protection measures concerning work-related stress, both for assessment and intervention on psychosocial risks. This paper focuses on a case study identified in a specific organizational context of a upper middle school.
Method. Starting from a research-intervention perspective, this paper was primarily based on the use of the "Psychosocial Risk Assessment" (Va.RP) Italian tool, in shape for medium organizations, Va.RP-M, in a further form specially remodeled for organizational school contexts. Some of the dimensions
4 measured by the instrument are: the role, transparency of information, support, the relationship between work vs. private life, the perception of organizational and managerial aspects. In addition to this instrument, it was made a board regarding the "practical solutions" deemed most relevant according to the critical organizational received by workers, closing with a request for comments and suggestions on initiatives in order to prevent work-related stress.
Results. The results show an emerging dissatisfaction primarily related to the dimensions of perceived lack of organizational justice, role, career advancement, leadership and work flexibility. As for "practical solutions" suggested, respondents identify priorities for high salient specific actions.
Conclusions. Overall, it is confirmed as the face and prevent work-related stress is a process that must involve all stakeholders comprised into the organization, with a particular concern in promoting a strength of organizational management, to improve the well-being in partcular in classroom settings. Teachers emerge as a figure of multiparty function experienced in the psychosocial dynamics considered.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) Avallone F, Paplomatas A. Salute organizzativa. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2005.
2) Santavirta N, Solovieva S, Theorell T. The association of job strain and exhaustion in a cohort of 1,028 Finnish teachers. Br J Educ Psychol 2007; 77(1), 213: 228.
3) Magrini A, Livigni L, Neri A, Pietroiusti A, Bernabucci A, Coppeta L, Moscatelli M, Bergamaschi A. Esperienze di valutazione dello stress lavoro correlato. G Ital Med Lav Erg Suppl 2 2011; 337: 338.
4) Hart PM, Wearing AJ, Conn M, Carter NL, Dingle RK. Development of the school organisational climate. Br J Educ Psychol 2000; 70, 211: 228.
5) Cavalli A. (a cura di). Gli insegnanti di fronte al cambiamento - Seconda indagine lARD sul corpo insegnante della scuola italiana. Milano: JARD, 2000.
6) Capaldo N, Ronandini L. Gestire e organizzare nella scuola dell'autonomia. Trento: Erickson, 2002.
7) Bonetto R, Contarello A. Teachers' Social Representations Between Well Being and Burnout at School. In: Fanti KA, eds. Applying Psychological Research to Understand and Promote the Well-being of Clinical and Non-clinical Populations. Atene: Atiner, 2009: 117-138. 8) Costa P. La Scuola come sistema in trasformazione. In: Berra A, Prestipino T. (a cura di) Sicurezza del lavoro e promozione del benessere organizzativo. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2011.
9) Kyriacou C. Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Rev Educ 2001; 53, 27: 35.
10) Guglielmi SR, Tatrow K. Occupational stress, burnout, and health in teachers: A methodological and theoretical analysis. Rev Educ Res 1998; 68, 61: 91.
11) Vandenberghe R, Huberman AM. Understanding and Preventing Teacher Burnout. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
12) Chaplain RP. Stress and psychological distress among trainee secondary teachers in England. Educ Psychol Rev 2008; 28, 195: 209.
13) Montgomery C, Rupp AA. Meta-analysis for Exploring the Diverse Causes and Effects of Stress in Teachers. Can Educ J 2005; 28, 458: 486.
14) Schaufeli WB, Enzmann D. The burnout companion to study and practice: A critical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis, 1998.
15) Betoret FD. Stressors, Self-Efficacy, Coping Resources, and Burnout among Secondary School Teachers in Spain. J Exp Educ 2006; 26, 519: 539.
16) Aiello A, Deitinger P, Nardella C. Il modello Valutazione dei Rischi Psicosociali "VARP". Metodologia e strumenti per una gestione sostenibile nelle micro e grandi aziende: dallo stress lavoro-correlato al mobbing. Milano: Franco Angeli, 2012.
17) Yin RK. Lo studio di caso nella ricerca scientifica. Roma: Armando Editore, 2005.
18) Leka S, Cox T. The European Framework for Psychosocial Risk Management: PRIMA-EF. UK: I-WHO publications, 2008.
19) Quick JC, Quick JD, Nelson DL, Hurrell Jr JJ. Preventive stress management in organizations. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 1997.

How to Cite



[Psychosocial well-being in school contexts: a case study analysis using the Va.RP tool]. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 40(2), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.537