Original Articles
20 February 2025
Vol. 40 No. 2 (2018)
Potentiation of muscle strength by focal vibratory stimulation on quadriceps femoris
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
29
Views
10
Downloads
Authors
Introduction: Several studies have investigated the effects of focal vibration on muscle strength. Non-univocal results have been found.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prolonged focal vibratory stimulation on quadriceps muscle strength at two different frequencies (80 and 300 Hz). The evaluation of muscle strength was performed at different intervals of time after the end of the vibratory stimulation in order to quantify the long-term effects and their trends over time.
Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were divided into three groups, a control group (no treatment) and two groups treated with vibratory stimulation (80 or 300 Hz) of relaxed quadriceps femoris bilaterally, once a day (30 min) for 5 consecutive days. The quadriceps' strength was measured through an isokinetic dynamometer, before and at three time intervals after the treatment, with a follow-up period of 4 weeks. The outcome measure was the Peak Torque (PT, Nm) of the quadriceps femoris produced by extension movement at three defined angular velocities and during isometric contraction. Results: No changes in PT were observed in the control group over time, while PT increased in the treated groups. No significant difference in PT behavior was observed between these two groups. PTs recorded before and after the treatment were markedly different (p < 0.05), and the increase in the PT persisted until the follow-up at 4 weeks, for all angular velocities tested.
Conclusion: Prolonged vibratory stimulation of the quadriceps femoris, both at 80 and at 300 Hz, leads to an increase in muscle strength. The vibration effect does not appear to fade at the end of treatment, but persists at the follow up, suggesting a likely underlying plastic process.
The results of the current study suggest that 30-min per day, 5 day focal vibratory treatment can be helpful during the clinical practice to regain muscular strength. It does not require patient's effort during the treatment, requires a little time, its effects are long-lasting, and there are no known adverse effects.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
1) Matthews, Peter BC. Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1974; 53(3): 143-144.
2) Lance JW. The mechanism of reflex irradiation. Proc Aust Assoc Neurol 1965; 3: 77-81.
3) Hagbarth KE, Eklund G. Tonic vibration reflexes (TVR) in spasticity. Brain Res 1966; 2(2): 201-3.
4) Gillies JD, Lance JW, Neilson PD, et al. Presynaptic inhibition of the monosynaptic reflex by vibration. J Physiol 1969; 205(2): 329-39. 5) Van Boxtel A. Differential effects of low-frequency depression, vibration-induced inhibition, and posttetanic potentiation on H-reflexes and tendon jerks in the human soleus muscle. J Neurophysiol 1986; 55(3): 551-68.
6) Schieppati M, Crenna P. From activity to rest: gating of excitatory autogenetic afferences from the relaxing muscle in man. Exp Brain Res 1984; 56(3): 448-57.
7) Hultborn H, Meunier S, Morin C, Pierrot-Deseilligny E. Assessing changes in presynaptic inhibition of I a fibres: a study in man and the cat. J Physiol 1987; 389: 729-56.
8) Schieppati M. The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol 1987; 28(4): 345-76.
9) Decandia M, Schieppati M, Rossini BM. Tonic contraction of calf muscles by non-tetanic stimulation of popliteal nerve in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1974; 37(3): 299-300.
10) Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB. The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain 1972; 95(4): 705-48.
11) Roll JP, Vedel JP, Ribot E. Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study. Exp Brain Res 1989; 76(1): 213-22.
12) Naito E, Ehrsson HH, Geyer S, et al. Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(14): 6134-44.
13) Romaiguère P, Anton JL, Roth M, et al. Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 16(1): 74-82.
14) Cafarelli E, Kostka CE. Effect of vibration on static force sensation in man. Exp Neurol 1981; 74(2): 331-40.
15) Jones LA, Hunter IW. Effect of muscle tendon vibration on the perception of force. Exp Neurol 1985; 87(1): 35-45.
16) Brooks J, Allen TJ, Proske U. The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint. Exp Brain Res 2013; 226(4): 617-29.
17) Ljung B, Hallbäck M, Sivertsson R, et al. Oxygen consumption and contractile force during vibrations of cat soleus muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1977; 100(3): 347-53.
18) Färkkila M, Pyykkö I, Korhonen O, et al. Vibration-induced decrease in the muscle force in lumberjacks. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1980; 43(1): 1-9.
19) Warman, G, Humphries, B & Purton, J. The effects of timing and application of vibration on muscular contractions. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine 2002; 73(2): 119-127.
20) Samuelson B, Jorfeldt L, Ahlborg B. Influence of vibration on endurance of maximal isometric contraction. Clin Physiol 1989; 9(1): 21-25. 21) Barnes MJ, Perry BG, Mündel T, et al. The effects of vibration therapy on muscle force loss following eccentrically induced muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112(3): 1189-94.
22) Bongiovanni LG, Hagbarth KE. Tonic vibration reflexes elicited during fatigue from maximal voluntary contractions in man. J Physiol 1990; 423: 1-14.
3) Bongiovanni LG, Hagbarth KE, Stjernberg L. Prolonged muscl
1bration reducing motor output in maximal voluntary contraction in man. J Physiol 1990b; 423: 15-26.
24) Kouzaki M, Shinohara M, Fukunaga T. Decrease in maximal voluntary contraction by tonic vibration applied to a single synergist muscle in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2000; 89(4): 1420-4. 25) Jackson SW, Turner DL. Prolonged muscle vibration reduces maximal voluntary knee extension performance in both the ipsilateral and the contralateral limb in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 88(4-5): 380-6. 26) Humphries B, Warman G, Purton J, et al. The Influence of Vibration on Muscle Activation and Rate of Force Development during Maximal Isometric Contractions. J Sports Sci Med 2004; 3(1): 16-22. 27) Issurin VB, Liebermann DG, Tenenbaum G. Effect of vibratory stimulation training on maximal force and flexibility. J Sports Sci 1994; 12(6): 561-6.
28) Carson RG, Popple AE, Verschueren SM, et al. Superimposed vibration confers no additional benefit compared with resistance training alone. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20(6): 827-33.
29) Christova M, Rafolt D, Mayr W, et al. Vibration stimulation during non-fatiguing tonic contraction induces outlasting neuroplastic effects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010; 20(4): 627-35.
30) Filippi GM, Brunetti O, Botti FM, et al. Improvement of stance control and muscle performance induced by focal muscle vibration in young-elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90(12): 2019-25.
31) Brunetti O, Botti FM, Roscini M, et al. Focal vibration of quadriceps muscle enhances leg power and decreases knee joint laxity in female volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2012; 52(6): 596-605. 32) Brunetti O. Botti FM. Brunetti A. et al. Effects of focal vibration on bone mineral density and motor performance of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2015; 55(1-2): 118-27. 33) Iodice P, Bellomo RG, Gialluca G, et al. Acute and cumulative effects of focused high-frequency vibrations on the endocrine system and muscle strength. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111(6): 897-904 34) Ingemann-Hansen T, Halkjaer-Kristensen J. Force-velocity relationships in the human quadriceps muscles. Scand J Rehabil Med 1979; 11(2): 85-9.
35) Fontana Hde B, Roesler H, Herzog W. In vivo vastus lateralis forcevelocity relationship at the fascicle and muscle tendon unit level. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014; 24(6): 934-40.
36) Guilhem G, Giroux C, Couturier A, et al. Validity of trunk extensor and flexor torque measurements using isokinetic dynamometry. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014; 24(6): 986-93.
37) Ramsay JA, Blimkie CJ, Smith K, et al. Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990; 22(5): 605-14. 38) Forner-Cordero A, Steyvers M, Levin O, Alaerts K, et al. Changes in corticomotor excitability following prolonged muscle tendon vibration. Behav Brain Res 2008; 190(1): 41-9.
39) Cochrane DJ. The Acute Effect of Direct Vibration on Muscular Power Performance in Master Athletes. Int J Sports Med 2016; 37(2): 144-8.
40) Pettorossi VE, Panichi R, Botti FM, et al. Long-lasting effects of neck muscle vibration and contraction on self-motion perception of vestibular origin. Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126(10): 1886-900. 41) McKeehen JN, Novotny SA, Baltgalvis KA, et al. Adaptations of mouse skeletal muscle to low-intensity vibration training. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 2013; 45(6): 1051-9.
42) Ushiyama J, Masani K, Kouzaki M, et al. Difference in aftereffects following prolonged Achilles tendon vibration on muscle activity during maximal voluntary contraction among plantar flexor synergists. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2005; 98(4): 1427-33.
43) Rabini A, De Sire A, Marzetti E, et al. Effects of focal muscle vibration on physical functioning in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51(5): 513-20.
44) Blottner D, Salanova M, Püttmann B, et al. Human skeletal muscle structure and function preserved by vibration muscle exercise following 55 days of bed rest. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 97(3): 261-71. 45) Casale R, Ring H, Rainoldi A. High frequency vibration conditioning stimulation centrally reduces myoelectrical manifestation of fatigue in healthy subjects. J Electromyog Kinesiol 2009; 19(5): 998-1004. 46) Eriksson E, Häggmark T, Kiessling KH, et al. Effect of electrical stimulation on human skeletal muscle. Int J Sports Med 1981; 2(1): 18-22.
47) Golik-Peric D, Drapsin M, Obradovic B, et al. Short-term isokinetic training versus isotonic training: effects on asymmetry in strength of thigh muscles. J Hum Kinet 2011; 30: 29-35.
48) Oliveira AS, Corvino RB, Gonçalves M, et al. Effects of a single habituation session on neuromuscular isokinetic profile at different movement velocities. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 110(6): 1127-33.
49) Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, et al. The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles. J Physiol 1976a; 261(3): 673-93.
50) Roll JP, Vedel JP. Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res 1982; 47(2): 177-90.
51) Zvijac JE, Toriscelli TA, Merrick S, et al. Isokinetic concentric quadriceps and hamstring strength variables from the NFL Scouting Combine are not predictive of hamstring injury in first-year professional football players. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41(7): 1511-8.
52) Blimkie CJ. Resistance training during pre- and early puberty: efficacy, trainability, mechanisms, and persistence. Can J Sport Sci 1992; 17(4): 264-79.
53) Pietrangelo T, Mancinelli R, Toniolo L, et al. Effects of local vibrations on skeletal muscle trophism in elderly people: mechanical, cellular, and molecular events. Int J Mol Med 2009; 24(4): 503-12.
54) Aprile I, Di Sipio E, Germanotta M, et al. Muscle focal vibration in healthy subjects: evaluation of the effects on upper limb motor performance measured using a robotic device. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016 Apr; 116(4): 729-37.
55) Burke D, Hagbarth KE, Löfstedt L, et al. The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. J Physiol 1976b; 261(3): 695-711.
56) Fattorini L, Ferraresi A, Rodio A, et al. Motor performance changes induced by muscle vibration. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 98(1): 79-87. 57) Dirks ML, Wall BT, Snijders T, Ottenbros CL, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014 Mar; 210(3): 628-41.
58) Vaz MA, Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Lanferdini FJ, Mayer A, Arampatzis A, Herzog W. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces structural and functional losses of quadriceps muscle and improves health status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr; 31(4): 511-6.
59) Dirks ML, Hansen D, Van Assche A, Dendale P, Van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Mar; 128(6): 357-65. 60) Williams N, Flynn M. A review of the efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014 Jan; 30(1): 6-11.
How to Cite
Potentiation of muscle strength by focal vibratory stimulation on quadriceps femoris. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 40(2), 90-96. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.538
Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.