Original Articles
20 February 2025
Vol. 43 No. 3 (2021)

[Use of a sensorized system in the selection of pelvic postural units in post-stroke patients]

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
25
Views
15
Downloads

Authors

The recording of pressure and shear forces during the sitting posture in a wheelchair is important for verifying or guiding the choice of postural units for the pelvis of patients in rehabilitation. The use of a sensorized mattress during dynamic tests with patients provides objective data that can be easily interpreted by the doctor and the occupational therapist and helps in the decision of the functionally best solution. The present study concerns the choice of the pelvic postural unit, based on objective, subjective and clinical-functional data, for three post-stroke patients.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) Swain ID, Bader DL. The measurement of interface pressure and its role in soft tissue breakdown. Journal of tissue viability 2002; 12(4): 132-146. 2) Stockton L, Gebhardt KS, Clark M. Seating and pressure ulcers: Clinical practice guideline. Journal of tissue viability 2009; 18(4): 98-108. 3) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Pressure ulcers: the management of pressure ulcers in primary and secondary care (CG29). National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2005. 4) Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology ver. 2.0. The Institute for Matching Persons and Technology: Webster, NY, 2000.
5) Brienza DM, Karg PE. Seat cushion optimization: a comparison of interface pressure and tissue stiffness characteristics for spinal cord injured and elderly patients. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1998; 79(4): 388-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90138-1
6) Yuen HK, Garrett D. Comparison of three wheelchair cushions for effectiveness of pressure relief. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2001; 55(4): 470-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.4.470
7) Bain DS, Ferguson-Pell M. Remote monitoring of sitting behavior of people with spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2002; 39(4): 513-520.
8) Briggs MS, Rethman KK, Crookes J, Cheek F, Pottkotter K, McGrath S., ... & Quatman-Yates CC. Implementing patientreported outcome measures in outpatient rehabilitation settings: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2020; 101(10): 1796-1812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.04.007
9) Stinson M, Ferguson R, Porter-Armstrong A. Exploring repositioning movements in sitting with 'at risk' groups using accelerometry and interface pressure mapping technologies. Journal of tissue viability 2018; 27(1): 10-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2017.11.001
10) Garber SL, Krouskop TA, Carter RE. A system for clinically evaluating wheelchair pressure-relief cushions. The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 1978; 32(9): 565-570.

How to Cite



[Use of a sensorized system in the selection of pelvic postural units in post-stroke patients]. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 43(3), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.548