Original Articles
21 September 2022
Vol. 44 No. 3 (2022)
[Remote functional assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur sportsmen with sedentary work]
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
36
Views
16
Downloads
Authors
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured knee ligament. Currently there are two commonly used surgical procedures: middle third patellar tendon grafts (bone-patellar tendon-bone: BTB) and semitendinosus autografts or semitendinosus combined with gracilis tendon autografts (ST/G).
Purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the rehabilitation results over time of amateur sportsmen who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery by means of one of the two most commonly used procedures: middle third patellar tendon grafts (bone-patellar tendon-bone: BTB) and semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts (ST/G). Method. 30 subjects divided into two groups, (15 BTB and 15 ST / G), were evaluated during rehabilitation and at three follow-up periods (16 weeks, 24 weeks, 2 years). Evaluation involved clinical examination, isokinetic tests, and functional rating scales: Lysholm and IKDC.
Results. The clinical evaluation resulted in the following mean values: the value of the Lysholm score was 78 in both group at 16 weeks, 91 in group A and 94 in group B at 24 weeks, 98 in group A and 99 in group B at 2 years; the value of the IKDC score was 14 in group A and 15 in group B at 16 weeks, 12 in group A and 14 in group B at 24 weeks, 14 in group A and 15 in group B at 2 years. No major complications occurred during rehabilatation Conclusions. Subjects in both groups showed good neoligament stability up to the 24-week follow up. At the 2-year follow-up the subjects of group B showed poor neoligament stability that prevented the return to the previous level of sporting activity; all the subjects with high intensity sports activity needed a greater muscle strengthening. No statistically significant differences between the two groups are seen.
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
1) Johnson RJ, Beynnon BD, Nichols CE, Renstrom PA. Current concepts rewiew. The treatment of injures of the ACL. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:140-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199274010-00020
2) Lync MA, Henning CE. Osteoarthritis in the ACL-deficient knee. In: Feagin JA, editor. New Yorki: Churchill Livingstone; 1988:385-91. 3) Frank CB, Jackson DW. Current concepts review. The science of reconstruction of the ACL. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1556-76. 4) Andersson C, Odensten M, Gillquist J. Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the ACL: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 1991;264:255-63. 5) Satku K, Kumar VP, Ngoi SS. ACL injures. To counsel or to operate? J bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:458-61.
6) Ferretti A, Conteduca F, De carli A, Fontana M, Mariani PP. Osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL reconstruction. Int Ortop. 1991;15:367-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186881
7) Howe Jg, Johnson RJ, Kaplan MJ, Fleming B, Jarvinem M. ACL reconstruction using quadriceps patellar tendon graft. Part 1. Longterm follow-up. Am J sports Med. 1991;19:447-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900505
8) Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Lofgren AC, Brenderberg M, Westman I, Wredmark T. A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon graft in reconstruction of the ACL. J bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:348-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B3.0830348
9) Pinczewski LA, Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Russel VJ, Clingeleffer A. A fve-year comparison of patellar tendon versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:523-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465020300041201
10) Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Hamada M Shino K. Evaluation of active knee flection and hamstring strength after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:598-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32868
11) Viola RW, Sterett WI, Newfield D, Steadman JR, Torry MR. Internal and external tibial rotation strength after ACL reconstruction using Ipsilateral semitendineus and gracilis tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:552-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280041801
12) Segawa H, Omori G, Coga Y, Kameo T, Lida S, Tanaka M. Rotational muscle strength of the limb after ACL reconstruction using semitendinous and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:117-82. 13) Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA, Pinczewski LA. Patellar versus Hamstring tendon in ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Arthtoscopy. 2001;17:248-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.29894
14) Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:2-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310011501
15) Barret GR, Noojin FK, Hartzog CW, Nash CR. Reconstruction of ACL in females: a comparision of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:46-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.25974
16) Fox Ja, Nedeff DD, Bach BR, Spindler KP. ACL reconstruction with patellar autograft tendon. Clin Orthop. 2002;402:53-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200209000-00006
17) Shelbourne KD, Trumper RV. Preventing anterior knee pain after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:41-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500108
18) Hardin GT, Bach BR et al. Endoscopic single incision ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft: surgical technique. Am J Knee Surg. 1992;5:144-155.
19) Terry GG, Janssen EW. ACL reconstruction whit patellar tendon graft. Sport Med Arthroscopy Review. 1997;5:136-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00132585-199700520-00008
20) Puddu G. Method for reconstruction fo ACL using the semitendinus tendon. Am J Sports Med. 1980;8:402-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658000800603
21) Mazzola C, Olivieri M, Merello A, Calogerà R, Rettagliata F. La ricostruzione del LCA con ST/GR: evoluzione dei sistemi di fissazione. Riv. It. Biol. Med. 1999;19 (Suppl. 1 al n. 1-2):70-75. 22) Flandry F, Hunt JP, Terry GC, Hughston JC. Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales. Am J sports Med. 1991;19:112-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900204
23) Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J. Rating system in evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop. 1985;198:43-49. 24) Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J. A performance test to monitor rehabilitation and evaluate ACL injuries. Am J sports Med. 1986:14:156-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658601400212
25) Hefti F, Muller W, JakobRP, Staubli HU. Evaluation of knee ligament injures with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumato Arthrosc. 1993;1:226-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560215
26) Irrgang JJ, Anderson,AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbourne KD. Development and Validation of The IKDC subjective Knee Form. Am J sports Med. 2001;29:600-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290051301
27) Della Villa S, Zanobbi M, Nanni G. La riabilitazione dopo ricostruzione chirurgica del LCA. Aggiornamenti in riabilitazione sportiva, Il ginocchio instabile nell'atleta, 61-74, 1997, Edi-Ermes, Milano.
28) Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther: 1992;15:256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1992.15.6.256
29) B. Quelard, O. Rachet, B. Sonnery-Cottet, P. Chambat. Rieducazione postoperatoria degli innesti del legamento crociato anteriore. EMC (Elseviet Masson SAS, Paris), Medicina Riabilitativa 26-240-C-10, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1283-078X(10)70196-6
30) Respizzi S. L'esercizio isocinetico: applicazioni e limiti in riabilitazione sportiva. Aggiornamenti in riabilitazione sportiva, Appendice, 135-154, 1997, Edi-Ermes, Milano.
31) Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H. Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for ACL reconstruction: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J sports Med. 2001;29:722-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290060901
32) Feller JA, Webster KE. A randomized comparision of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. Am J sports Med. 2003;31:564-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310041501
33) Marder RA, Raskind JR, Carrol M. Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assistet ACL reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinous ad gracilis tendons. Am J Sport med. 1991;19:478-84. 34) Shaieb MD, Kan MD, Chang SK, Marumoto Jm, Richardson AB. A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:214-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659101900510
35) David J Biau, Caroline Tournoux, Sandrine Katsahian, Peter J Schranz and Rémy S Nizard. Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis; BMJ 2006; 332; 995-1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38784.384109.2F
36) Rudolf W Poolman1, Forough Farrokhyar and Mohit Bhandari. Hamstring tendon autograft better than bone patellartendon bone autograft in ACL reconstruction. A cumulative meta-analysis and clinically relevant sensitivity analysis applied to a previously published analysis. Acta Orthopaedica 2007;78(3):350-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710013915
37) Beynnon BD, Johnson RJ, Fleming BC, Kannus P, Kaplan, Samani J, Renström. ACL replacement: comparison of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone grafts whit Two-Strand hamstring grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1503-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200209000-00001
38) Isokinetic assesment with two years follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon or hamstring tendons. J. Condoureta, J. Cohnb, J.-M. Ferretb, A. Lemonsua, W. Vasconcelosc, D. Dejourc, J.-F. Potela and et la Société française d'arthroscopie. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot Vol. 94 Issue 8 Suppl Pg. 375-82 (Dec 2008).
39) Ageberg E, Roos HP, Grävare-Silbernagel K, Thomeé R, Roos E (2009) Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:162-169 40) Aglietti P, Giron F, Buzzi R, Biddau F, Sasso F. ACL reconstruction: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone compared whit Double Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2143-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0645-4
41) Solomonow M, Baratta R, Zhou BH, Shoji H, Bose W, Beck C, D'Ambrosia R (1987) The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability. Am J Sports Med 3:207-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658701500302
42) Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz P, Nizard R. ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:180-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803dcd6b
43) Dave YH Lee, Sarina Abdul Karim, Haw Chong Chang. Return to Sports After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Review of Patients with Minimum 5-year Follow-up. Annals Academy of Medicine. April 2008, Vol. 37 No. 4. 273-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V37N4p273
44) Patrick Sadoghi & Peter E. Müller & Volkmar Jansson & Martin van Griensven & Albert Kröpfl & Martin F. Fischmeister. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinicalcomparison of bonepatellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique. Int Orthop. 2010 May 5. [Epub ahead of print] 45) Annette Heijne, Suzanne Werner. A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstructionusing patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts:a prospective randomised outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Jun; 18(6):805-13. Epub 2009 Oct 23. 46) Justin Roe, Leo A. Pinczewski, Vivianne J. Russell, Lucy J. Salmon, Tomomaro Kawamata and Melvin Chew. A 7-Year Follow-up of Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Grafts for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Differences and Similarities. Am. J. Sports Med. 2005; 33; 1337-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504274145
47) Daniel Andersson, M.D., Kristian Samuelsson, M.D., and Jón Karlsson, M.D., Ph.D. Evidence-Based Medicine Series Systematic Review. Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries With Special Reference to Surgical Technique and Rehabilitation: An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 25, No 6 (June), 2009: pp 653-685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2009.04.066
48) Ljiljana Bogunovic, Matthew J Matava. Operative and nonoperative treatment options for ACL tears in the adult patient: a conceptual review. Phys Sportsmed. 2013 Nov;41(4):33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2013.11.2034
49) D D Buss, R Min, M Skyhar, B Galinat, R F Warren, T L Wickiewicz. Nonoperative treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a selected group of patients. Am J Sports Med Mar-Apr 1995;23(2):160-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300206
50) Hanus M, Stancák A, Stastny E, Tr T. Reoperace plastik LCA v nasem souboru [Revision ACL Reconstruction in Our Study Population]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(2):124130. Czech. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2021/021
51) Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Metaanalysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct; 475(10):2459-2468. doi: 10.1007/11999-017-5278-9. PMID: 28205075; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5278-9
52) Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of bonepatellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2015 Mar; 22(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
How to Cite
[Remote functional assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in amateur sportsmen with sedentary work]. (2022). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 44(3), 366-375. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.571
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.