[Monitoring exposure to metallic elements in the Taranto steel plant]

Monitoraggio dell’esposizione ad elementi metallici nello stabilimento siderurgico di Taranto

Published: February 24 2025
Abstract Views: 28
PDF: 11
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Objective. To assess, by means of biological monitoring, the potential exposure to metallic elements of workers operating in the integrated route steelworks plant in Taranto.
Methods. A total of 755 workers from different working areas of the steelworks plant, with potential occupational exposure to metallic elements (Exposed), and 101 workers from the finished products embarking area of the same plant, not exposed to metallic elements (Not exposed), were examined. After the administration of questionnaire inquiring about working activity, residence location and lifestyle habits, all the workers collected a urine sample for the determination of Cr, Mn, Co, Cu, Zn, Cd, Hg, Pb by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), of Ni by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), and of urinary creatinine. Moreover, all the workers underwent venous blood sampling for the determination of Pb by AAS. The results of the environmental monitoring of Cr, Mn, Co, Cu, Cd, Hg, Pb and Ni, carried out by specialized companies in the same period of biomonitoring in some of the working areas where potentially exposed workers operate, were also obtained.
Results. None of the examined metallic elements showed values exceeding the specific ACGTH BEl, while only urinary Co and Zn exceeded the reference values of the laboratory where analyzes were carried out in more than 5% of the determinations (5.9 %), only in the not exposed workers. Moreover, more than 5% of the determinations higher than the reference values of the Italian Reference Values Society (SIVR) were observed for urinary Cu, both in potentially exposed (19.2%) and in not exposed workers (19.8%), and for urinary Cd, only in potentially exposed workers (6%). Comparison between potentially exposed and not exposed workers showed higher concentrations in the former only for urinary Mn (p <0.05). Environmental monitoring showed airborne concentrations of metallic elements almost always lower than TLV-TWA ACGIH, with most of the determinations below the respective limits of detection for all the metallic elements, except for Mn.
Conclusions. The study did not show the presence of metallic elements higher in the potentially exposed than in the not exposed workers, except for urinary Mn that, however, was always included both in SIVR and in the laboratory reference values.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) De Palma G, Corsini A, Gilberti E, et al. Monitoraggio biologico dell'esposizione ad elementi cancerogeni e ad idrocarburi policiclici aromatici in quattro settori metallurgici secondari. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2012; 34 (3 Suppl): 44-7.
2) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for Manganese. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: ATSDR, 2012.
3) Hamzah NA, Mohd Tamrin SB, Ismail NH. Metal dust exposure and lung function deterioration among steel workers: an exposureresponse relationship. Int J Occup Environ Health 2016; 22: 224-32. 4) Hughson GW, Galea KS, Heim KE. Characterization and assessment of dermal and inhalable nickel exposures in nickel production and primary user industries. Ann Occup Hyg 2010; 54: 8-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2016.1207040
5) Wronska-Nofer T, Pisarska A, Trzcinka-Ochocka M, et al. Scintigraphic assessment of renal function in steel plant workers occupationally exposed to lead. J Occup Health 2015; 57: 91-9. 6) World Health Organization. Biological Monitoring of Chemical Exposure in the Workplace, vol. 1. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.14-0115-OA
7) Apostoli P. Elements in environmental and occupational medicine. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2002; 778: 63-97. 8) Benedict SR, Behre JA. Some application of a new color reaction for creatinine. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1936; 114: 515-32. 9) UNICHIM. Metodo 1998:2013. Ambienti di lavoro - Determinazione della frazione inalabile delle particelle aerodisperse - Metodo gravimetrico. UNICHIM, 2013 10) UNICHIM. Metodo 2010:2011. Ambienti di lavoro - Determinazione della frazione respirabile delle particelle aerodisperse - Metodo gravimetrico. UNICHIM, 2011 11) EPA. Method 6020B. Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Environmental Protection Agency, 2014.
12) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. TLVs and BEls for chemical substances and physical agents. Cincinnati, OH, US: ACGIH, 2018.
13) Italian Society of Reference Values. 4ª lista dei valori di riferimento per elementi, composti organici e loro metaboliti. Edizione 2017. SIVR, 2017.
14) Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits. SCOEL/OPIN/136 for cadmium and inorganic compounds. SCOEL 08 February 2017. 15) Soleo L, Lovreglio P, Panuzzo L, et al. Valutazione del rischio per la salute da esposizione a elementi metallici nei lavoratori del siderurgico e nella popolazione generale di Taranto (Italia). G Ital Med Lav Erg 2012; 34: 381-91.
16) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for Cadmium. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: ATSDR, 2012.

How to Cite



[Monitoring exposure to metallic elements in the Taranto steel plant]: Monitoraggio dell’esposizione ad elementi metallici nello stabilimento siderurgico di Taranto. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 40(3), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.587

Most read articles by the same author(s)