Original Articles
13 April 2017
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.611

[Risk assessment and its appropriateness to support the physician in certifying a suspected technopathy]

La valutazione dei rischi e la sua appropriatezza a supporto del medico nella certificazione di sospetta tecnopatia

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
29
Views
9
Downloads

Authors

Giuseppe Taino
giuseppe.taino@icsmaugeri.it
Unità Operativa Ospedaliera di Medicina del Lavoro, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Franco Pugliese
Dipartimento Sicurezza Ausl di Piacenza, Italy.
Daniela Bonetti
INAIL Sovrintendenza Sanitaria Regionale Emilia Romagna, Bologna, Italy.
Marcello Imbriani
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia; Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Medicina Sperimentale e Forense, Università di Pavia, Italy.

The topic of appropriateness was defined as the new frontier of development of health interventions. RH Brook in an Editorial published in the BMJ in 1994 defines the appropriateness"... an intervention for which the expected benefits are greater (with a sufficient margin) the possible negative consequences ... excluding economic considerations". In workplaces the goal of appropriateness should cover not only the actions of health surveillance and health protocols, but also and primarily all stages of the risk assessment process. Only through an assessment of occupational risks that aims to identify, evaluate and measure the real professional risk factors in specific working environments, it is possible to meet the requirements of effectiveness, efficiency and protection of ethical principles in the identification of priorities (according to values of person, community and society) that represent the size of the appropriateness of an intervention. At the same time, the risk assessment should provide to the occupational pyisician instruments to study with scientific, justifiable and reproducible criteria the possible correlation between damage to the worker's health and the occupational risk factors.
In the process of reporting of suspected technopathy, both for prevention purposes (according to art. 139 of Presidential Decree 1165/68, art. 10 of Legislative Decree 38/00 and DM 10 June 2014), both for insurance purposes (according to art. 53 of Presidential Decree 1165/68 and Ministerial Decree 9 April 2008), it should be considered two indispensable judgment elements to study the correlation between the disease and the work: on the one hand the level (measured or estimated) of the occupational risk factors; on the other hand the appropriateness of the risks assessment compared to the best and most current scientific evidence (Evidence Based Medicine - EBM), according to technical standards and specific guidelines.
Our study underlines the importance of appropriateness in the risk assessment process to analyze the correlation between the exposure to specific occupational hazards and the suspected technopathy.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
1) Brook RH. Editorial BMJ - January 1994, 308: 218.
2) WHO Regional Office for Europe. Appropriateness in health care services, 2000.
3) Manuale di formazione per il governo clinico: appropriatezza - Dipartimento della programmazione e dell'ordinamento del servizio sanitario nazionale - Direzione generale della programmazione sanitaria - luglio 2012.
4) ILO convention n. 161, 1985.
5) National Academy of Science. Risk assessment in the Federal Government: managing the process. Chapter 1 The nature of Risk Assessment National Academy of Science, National Academy press, Washington, D.C. 1983, pp. 17- 51.
6) OSHA EU - E FACTS n. 80-81. La valutazione del rischiohttp://osha.europa.eu 7) Wilson R, Crouch EAC. Risk assessment and comparison: an introduction. Science 1987; 236: 267-270.
8) Bartolucci GB et al. - Linee Guida per la valutazione del rischio - Linee Guida per la formazione continua e l'accreditamento del medico del lavoro - Tipografia PIME Editrice - 2004.
9) Hulshof CTJ et al. Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and systematic review of empirical studies. Occup Environ Med 1999;56: 361-377.
10) Taino G, Gazzoldi T, Brevi M, Giorgi M, Imbriani P. Sindrome metabolica e lavoro a turni: studio dell'associazione in una popolazione di lavoratori di un' industria chimica. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2011 Jul-Sep; 33 (4): 456-461.
11) Franco G, Cella MT, Tuccillo E, Ferrari F, Minisci E, Fusetti L. From Risk-based Health Surveillance to Health Promotion: An Evidence-Based Experience in a Health Care Setting. Int J Occ Med Envir Health 2002;15: 117-120.
12) Taino G, Paraluppi P, Giorgi M, D'Orso MI, Piccoli B. Le malattie professionali da radiazioni ottiche artificiali (ROA). La Medicina del Lavoro 2013 Gen-Mar; 104, 1: 3-23.
13) Franco G. Consensus of evidence or evidence of consensus? The evolving role and the new expertise of the occupational physician (Editorial). Occupational Medicine, 2003; 53: 79-81.
14) Taino G, Pezzuto C, De Icco R, et al. Crisi d'ansia reattiva e disturbo dell'adattamento cronico: un caso particolare di infortunio sul lavoro e di sospetta malattia professionale. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2014; 36: 118-123.

How to Cite



[Risk assessment and its appropriateness to support the physician in certifying a suspected technopathy]: La valutazione dei rischi e la sua appropriatezza a supporto del medico nella certificazione di sospetta tecnopatia. (2017). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 39(2), 100-105. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.611
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.