Proceedings of the Meeting on "The use of causal probability in medical radiation protection", Pavia, Italy, 22 October 2016
13 April 2017
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2017)

[Oncological disease: dimensions of the phenomenon and the role of ionising radiation]

La malattia oncologica: dimensioni del fenomeno e ruolo delle radiazioni ionizzanti

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
26
Views
8
Downloads

Authors

Age is an extremely important factor in cancer development, since the incidence of cancer increases significantly with age. Because of aging of the Italian population, although the incidence is kept constant, the number of cancer diagnosis is inevitably going to increase over time only to increasing age. Survival after the diagnosis of cancer is one of the main indicators that allow to evaluate the effectiveness of the health system against the cancer disease. The 5-year survival after diagnosis is a widely used indicator. If we consider the relative survival data after 5 years of diagnosis, for cancer cases diagnosed in subsequent three-year periods, from 1990-1992 to 2005-2007, it shows that the 5-year survival has increased significantly over time for both men and women. Many so-called patients "long-term survivors "are of working age and should return to work. This aims to ensure both the mental and social well-being of the worker, both industrial production. For the oncogenic risk assessment by ionizing radiation, the ICRP Publication 60 has referred to the mortality and cancer data collected from 1950 to 1985 by the RERF, Japan-US bi-national institution with headquarters in Hiroshima that leads the research program called Life Span study (LSS), that is the study of the long-term effects on survivors of the bomb A. For the thyroid, instead, reference is made to the data from medical irradiations, as well as for liver and bone, using in this case adapted data relating to exposure to alpha rays (thorium and radio). The interpretation model is the traditional one: the linear dose-effect assumptions without a threshold even at small doses (LNT theory) when epidemiological data are not more informative for statistical uncertainty, although we resort to radiobiological studies. In transferring the risk among different populations ICRP in Publication 103 accommodates the idea that for each type of cancer is more suitable, from time to time, the additive or multiplicative model or a combination of the two. To study the oncogenic role of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation in the onset of neoplastic disease, the probability of cause (PC), is a "reasonable way to address the problem of evaluation of the likelihood that previous exposure to ionizing radiation (IR) is responsible for an oncogenic event "(Committee on Radiation Protection and Measurements - NCKP - Statement N. 7 of 30/09/92).

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1) Le Cause del Cancro. Il Pensiero Scientifico Editore, 1983 - Traduzione italiana a cura di Silvia Franceschi e Carlo La Vecchia.
2) I numeri del cancro in Italia 2015 - AIOM, CCM, AIRTUM - Intermedia Editrice, Brescia - 2016. Available from: www.registri-tumori.it/ cms/it/node/3993 3) Taino G, Gazzoldi T, Brevi M, Giorgi M, Imbriani P. Sindrome metabolica e lavoro a turni: studio dell'associazione in una popolazione di lavoratori di un'industria chimica. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2011 Jul-Sep; 33 (4): 456-461.
4) Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: TARC Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr, accessed on day/month/year.
5) Pirastu R, Ancona C, lavarone I, Mitis F, Zona A, Comba P. La valutazione dell'evidenza epidemiologica - Epidemiologia e Prevenzione - 2010; 34 (5-6) supp 3.
6) National Research Council. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR V. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 1990.
7) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP 60. 1991.
8) Recommendations of the international Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP 103. 2007.
9) Associazione Italiana Radioprotezione Medica, Linee guida AIRM: sorveglianza medica dei lavoratori esposti a radiazioni ionizzanti. IPSOA, 2013j.
10) Taino G, Giroletti E, Delogu A, Malagò G, Corona G, Businaro J, Imbriani M. Il giudizio di idoneità al rischio da esposizione a radiazioni ionizzanti nei lavoratori con pregressa patologia neoplastica: criteri di valutazione e analisi di una casistica. La Medicina del Lavoro 2014; 105, 6: 445-472.
11) Taino G, Giroletti E. L'idoneità dopo patologia oncologica. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2015 Oct-Dec; 37 (3 suppl): 102-103.
12) Boice J D, ScD Jr, Mandel J S Doody MM. Breast cancer among radiologic technologists. JAMA 1995, Vol. 274(5): 394-401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530050042030
13) Sont W N, Zielinski J M, Ashmore J P et al. First analysis of cancer incidence and occupational radiation exposure based on the national dose registry of Canada. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001, Vol. 153 (4): 309-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/153.4.309
14) Spiers F W, Lucas H F, Rundo J. Leukaemia incidence in the US dial workers. Health Phys 1983; 44 Suppl 1: 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198310001-00004

How to Cite



[Oncological disease: dimensions of the phenomenon and the role of ionising radiation]: La malattia oncologica: dimensioni del fenomeno e ruolo delle radiazioni ionizzanti. (2017). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 39(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.616