Proceedings of the Meeting on "The use of causal probability in medical radiation protection", Pavia, Italy, 22 October 2016
13 April 2017
Vol. 39 No. 2 (2017)

[Probability of Causation: historical motivations and legal transposition]

Probability of Causation: motivazioni storiche e recepimento giuridico

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
19
Views
7
Downloads

Authors

The Probability of Causation (PC) was implemented to provide objective and legally feasible compensation to the U.S. diseased individuals who were involved in nuclear armament activities. The methodology is related to the attributable risk concept, but it is widely different from it, since it doesn't evaluate the attributablity from a collective point of view, but from a personalistic  point, that is from the particular exposure condition, from the specific physical parameters and from the biological individual features of the single exposed subject. So the PC become an evaluation of the harm probability tailored for that specific exposed person, on the basis of the epidemiological indications coming from an exposed group with very similar characteristics of the under investigation individual. This is evidently feasible due to the extensive and comprehensive body of epidemiological research within the particular domain of radiation exposure. The process to reach the PC adoption took a long time, was plodding and politically thwarted and various reexaminations and bills during time were necessary to extended the laws to the different exposure categories. Now in the U.S. three departments (Health, Energy and Labour) are involved in the evaluation processes; they gather the personal, dosimetric and clinical data and with a computer program (usable on line also) based on the updated knowledge, evaluate the eligibility for compensation on the basis of the "more likely than not" criterion. The method meets the interest and the favor at international level and organizations in prominent positions in the pacific use of nuclear energy and in the radiation protection fields, like: NCRP, IAEA, WHO, ILO,... fight for it use. Now many institutional organism and the more enlightened justice courts utilize the PC to settle cases (increasing in frequency) in work and health activities, for which more often compensation claims are dealing with.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Bond VP. The cancer risk attributable to radiation exposure: some practical problems. Health Physics 1981: 40.
NIH - Report of the National Institutes of Health. Ad Hoc Working Group to Develop Radioepidemiological Tables - 1985.
Righi E, Di Pofi M, Trenta G. Tumori in soggetti radioesposti e nesso causale di probabilità (probability of causation) in Atti dell'ottavo Congresso Nazionale dell'Associazione Italiana di Radioprotezione Medica. Ischia, 6-9 Ottobre 1987. Ed. ENEA, Roma - 1989.
NCRP - National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. The probability that a particular malignancy may have been caused by a specific irradiation. Betesda, MD; NCRP Statement 7; 1992 (anche in Health Physics 1993 Vol. 64;116-119).
IAEA. Methods for estimating the probability of cancer from occupational radiation exposure. TAEA-TECDOC-870.
Barni M. Consulenza medico-legale e responsabilità medica con presentazione di Federico Stella. Giuffrè Editore, 2002.
NCI-CDC Working Group to Revise the 1985 NIH Radioepidemiological Tables. Dep of Health and Human Services. Sept. 2003. Health Physics 2008 July; Volume 95 - Issue 1.
ILO-IAEA-WHO. Approaches to Attribution of Detrimental Health Effects to Occupational lonizing Radiation Exposure and their Application in Compensation Programmes for Cancer. Occupational Safety and health Series No. 73 (2010).
INAIL. Radiazioni ionizzanti: Considerazioni tecniche sugli aspetti assicurativi e sul riconoscimento dei tumori professionali. 2013.

How to Cite



[Probability of Causation: historical motivations and legal transposition]: Probability of Causation: motivazioni storiche e recepimento giuridico. (2017). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 39(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.617