Original Articles
4 March 2025
Vol. 39 No. 4 (2017)
[The role of the perception of a safe environment and the relationship with job satisfaction: an exploratory study in three different occupational contexts]
Il ruolo della percezione del clima di sicurezza e la relazione con la soddisfazione lavorativa: uno studio esplorativo in tre differenti contesti occupazionali
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
51
Views
22
Downloads
Authors
Introduction. This study examined the role of the "safety climate", or the organization's attention to health and safety of workers, and of job demand and resources in relation with job satisfaction. Wellbeing at work is a topic of growing interest, in line with the legislation and the 264 programs on health and safety of workers and management and the evaluation of psychosocial risks. Several studies show that organizational actions concerning health and safety can be an indicator of the attention to employees' wellbeing, even if studies about the relationship between safety climate and some psychosocial outcomes are scant. Methods. The study analysed the relationship between job demand, job resources, safety climate and job satisfaction in three different occupational contexts (public authority, N = 224; social care organization, N = 115; pharmaceutical company, N = 127); workers were divided into groups based on the risk level appeared in the objective assessment of work-related stress, in order to identify differences. The self-report questionnaire gathered information about: job satisfaction, work efforts, supervisors' support, colleagues support, safety climate (a between .72 and .93).
Data analysis provided: Cronbach a, analysis of variance, correlations, stepwise multiple regressions. Results. The results showed that job satisfaction (R} between .23 and .88) had a negative relationship with efforts and a positive relationship with job resources and safety climate. Conclusions. It emerges the importance of safety climate: to support and promote wellbeing at work, organizations could endorse training and information programs on health and safety for all workers and management, not only for professional groups with high-risk level. Future studies could explore the relation between safety climate and other outcomes, such as emotional exhaustion or objective indicators of organizational health (e.g. absenteeism, accidents, ...).
Altmetrics
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
1) INAIL. Valutazione e gestione del rischio da stress lavoro-correlato, Manuale ad uso delle aziende in attuazione del D. Lgs 81/2008 e s.m.i. Roma, 2011.
2) Balducci C. Gestire lo stress nelle organizzazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2015.
3) Conway PM. Gli strumenti per la valutazione soggettiva del rischio stress lavoro-correlato. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2009; 31(2): 197-9.
4) Frascheri C. Punti fondamentali alla base dell'analisi dello stress lavoro-correlato. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2009; 31(3): 270-76.
5) Falco A, Girardi D, Sarto F, et al. Una nuova scala di misura degli effetti psico-fisici dello stress lavoro-correlato in una prospettiva d'integrazione di metodi. Med Lav 2012; 103(4): 288-308.
6) Cortese CG, Gerbaudo L, Manconi MP, et al. L'identificazione dei fattori di rischio stress lavoro-correlato in un'Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera: un approccio quali-quantitativo. Med Lav 2013; 104(2): 141-57.
7) Emanuel F, Molino M, Ghislieri C, et al. Dalla valutazione dello stress lavoro-correlato alla promozione del benessere organizzativo: il caso di una azienda farmaceutica italiana. Med Lav 2016; 107(5): 364-77.
8) Diener E: Subjective well-being: The science of happiness, and a proposal for national index. Am Psychol 2000; 55(1): 34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.34
9) Harari MJ, Waehler CA, Rogers JR. An Empirical Investigation of a Theoretically Based Measure of Perceived Wellness. J Counsel Psychol 2005(1); 52: 93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.93
10) Tay L, Kuykendall L, Diener E. Satisfaction and Happiness-The Bright Side of Quality of Life. In Glatzer W, Camfield L, Moller V, Rojas M (Eds.). Global Handbook of Quality of Life (pp. 839-53). New York, NY: Springer Netherlands, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9178-6_39
11) Cortese CG. La soddisfazione lavorativa del personale infermieristico. Adattamento italiano della scala Index of Work Satisfaction di Stamps. Med Lav 2007; 98(3): 175-91.
12) Colombo L, Zito M, Ghislieri C. Influenza lavoro-famiglia e supporti sociali: la soddisfazione lavorativa in un'azienda sanitaria del Nord Italia. Differenze tra personale sanitario e amministrativo. G Ital Med del Lav Erg 2012; 34(1): A25-A33.
13) Biggio G, Cortese CG. Well-being in the workplace through interaction between individual characteristics and organizational context. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2013; 8(19823): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v8i0.19823
14) Tims M, Bakker AB, Derks D. The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. J Occup Health Psychol 2013; 18(2): 230-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141
15) Ghislieri C, Colombo L, Molino M, et al. Job satisfaction in an Italian University: differences between academic and technical-administrative staff. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2014; 36(3): 160-7.
16) Spector PE. Job Satisfaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1997.
17) Hardy GE, Woods D, Wall TD. The impact of psychological distress on absence from work. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88(2): 306-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.306
18) Hellman C. Job satisfaction and intent to leave. J Soc Psychol 1997; 137: 677-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595491
19) Cortese CG. Predictors of intention to leave the nursing profession in two Italian hospitals. Assist Inferm Ric 2013; 32(1): 20-7.
20) Tabolli S, lanni A, Renzi C, et al. Soddisfazione lavorativa, burnout e stress del personale infermieristico: indagine in due ospedali di Roma. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2006; 28:1, Suppl Psicologia 1, 49-52.
21) Harter J, Hayes T, Schmidt F. Business unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 2002; 87(2): 268-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.268
22) Böckerman P, Ilmakunnas P. (2012). The Job Satisfaction-productivity Nexus: A Study Using Matched Survey and Register Data. Ind Labor Relat Rev 2012; 65(2): 244-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391206500203
23) Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. J Manag Psychol 2007; 22(3): 309-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
24) Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demands-resources theory. In Chen PY, Cooper CL (Eds.), Work and Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37-64). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118539415.wbwell019
25) Demerouti E, Bakker AB, Nachreiner F, et al: The job demandsresources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol 2001; 86(3): 499-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.3.499
26) Karasek RA, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books, 1990.
27) Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1(1): 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.1.1.27
28) Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: implications for improving work and health. In Bauer G, Hämmig O (Eds.), Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach (pp. 43-68). Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4
29) Siegrist J. Effort-reward Imbalance at Work and Health. In Perrewe P, Ganster D (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, Vol. 2: Historical and Current Perspectives on Stress and Health (pp. 261-91) New York: JAI Elsevier, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(02)02007-3
30) van Vegchela N, de Jonge J, Bosmab H, et al. Reviewing the effortreward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60(5): 1117-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043
31) Cortese CG. Job satisfaction of Italian nurses: An exploratory study. J Nurs Manag 2007; 15(3): 303-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00694.x
32) Seiger CP, Wiese BS. Social support from work and family domains as an antecedent or moderator of work-family conflicts? J Vocat Behav 2009; 75: 26-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.03.001
33) Caplan RD, Cobb S, French JRPJr, et al. Job demands and worker health: Main effects and occupational differences. Washington: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e573842014-001
34) Bono JE, Foldes HJ, Vinson G, et al. Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. J Appl Psychol 2007; 92(5): 1357-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1357
35) Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 1980; 65(1): 96-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.65.1.96
36) Zohar D. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro-accidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol 2000; 85(4): 587-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.587
37) Zohar D. Safety climate: conceptual and measurement issues. Washington, DC: America Psychological Association, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10474-006
38) Zohar D. Safety climate: conceptualization, measurement, and improvement. In Schneider B, Barbera KM (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture (pp. 317-34). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014.
39) Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of Safety at Work: A Framework for Linking Safety Climate to Safety Performance, Knowledge, and Motivation. J Occup Health Psychol 2000; 5(3): 347-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8998.5.3.347
40) Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, et al. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. J Appl Psychol 2009; 94(5): 1103-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172
41) Toderi S, Gaggia A, Mariani MG. Griffin and Neal's safety model: Determinants and components of individual safety performance in the Italian context. Med Lav 2015: 106(6): 447-59.
42) Smith GS, Huang YH, Ho M, et al. The relationship between safety climate and injury rates across industries: the need to adjust for injury hazards. Acc Anal Prev 2006; 38(3): 556-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.013
43) Cooper CL, Sloan SJ, Williams S. Occupational Stress Indicator management Guide. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t12433-000
44) Sirigatti S, Stefanile C. Adattamento italiano de OSI - Occupational Stress Inventory. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali, 2002.
45) Magnavita N. Two tools for health surveillance of job stress: the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire and the Siegrist Effort Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2007; 29(3 Suppl): 667-70.
46) Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91(4): 946-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
47) Wong CS, Hui C, Law KS. A longitudinal study of the job perception-job satisfaction relationship: A test of the three alternative specifications. J Occup Health Psychol 1998; 71(2): 127-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1998.tb00667.x
48) Setti I, Argentero P. The influence of operational and organizational stressors on the well-being of municipal police officers. Med Lav 2013; 104(5): 368-79.
49) Emanuel F, Colombo L, Ghislieri C. Benessere e malessere emotivo al lavoro nel contesto del call center. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 2014; 36(2), 95-101.
50) Molino M, Emanuel F, Zito M, et al. Inbound Call Centers and Emotional Dissonance in the Job Demands - Resources Model. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01133
51) Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 2003; 88(5): 879-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
52) Quaglino GP, Ghislieri C, Colombo L, et al. Il benessere nei call center: un approccio multidisciplinare di ricerca e valutazione. Med Lav 2010; 101(3): 169-88.
53) Fiabane E, Dordoni P, Argentero P. Subjective and objective indicators of job stress and burnout in a residential home for the elderly. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2016; 38(1): 42-9.
54) Giunchi M, Emanuel F, Chambel MJ, Ghislieri C. Job insecurity, workload and job exhaustion in temporary agency workers (TAWs) Gender differences. Career Dev Int 2016: 21(1): 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-07-2015-0103
55) Ghislieri C, Emanuel F, Molino M, et al. New technologies smart, or harm work-family boundaries management? Gender differences in conflict and enrichment using the JD-R theory. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 1070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01070
56) Conway PM, Aquilina T, Campanini P, et al. Valutare la percezione dei fattori di rischio da stress lavoro-correlato attraverso strumenti adatti al contesto: il caso degli addetti al call-center. G Ital Med Lav Erg 2011; 33(3 Suppl): 343-7.
57) Kurtessis JN, Eisenberger R, Ford MT, et al. (2015). Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J Manag 2015; published online before print DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
58) Barling J, Loughlin C, Kelloway EK. Development and test of a model linking safety- specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. J Appl Psychol 2002; 87(3): 488-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.488
59) DeJoy DM, Schaffer BS, Wilson MG, et al. Creating safer workplaces: Assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. J Safety Res 2004; 35(1), 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.018
60) Griffin MA, Talati Z. Safety leadership. In Day D. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations (pp. 638-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.031
61) Tesluk P, Quigley NR. Group and normative influence in health and safety designing healthy work: perspective from taking a broad view on team effectiveness. In Hofmann DA, Tetrick LE (Eds). Health and safety in organizations: A multi-level perspective (pp. 91-130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2003.
62) Turner N, Parker SK. The effect of teamwork on safety processes and outcomes. In Barling J, Frone MR (Eds.), The psychology of workplace safety (pp. 35-62). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10662-003
63) Brondino M, Silva SA, Pasini M. Multilevel approach to organizational and group safety climate and safety performance: Co-workers as the missing link. Safety Sci 2012; 50(9):1847-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.010
How to Cite
[The role of the perception of a safe environment and the relationship with job satisfaction: an exploratory study in three different occupational contexts]: Il ruolo della percezione del clima di sicurezza e la relazione con la soddisfazione lavorativa: uno studio esplorativo in tre differenti contesti occupazionali. (2025). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 39(4), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.641
Copyright (c) 2017 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.