ATTI 79° CONGRESSO NAZIONALE SIML
23 September 2016
Vol. 38 No. 3 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.713

[Overview of assistance and robotisation systems for operations involving ergonomic risks in the healthcare field]

Overview sui sistemi di ausiliazione e di robotizzazione delle operazioni a rischio ergonomico in ambito sanitario

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
11
Views
11
Downloads

Authors

Giorgia Chini
INAIL, Dipartimento di Medicina, Epidemiologia, Igiene del Lavoro ed Ambientale, Via Fontana Candida 1, 00078 Monte Porzio Catone (RM),, Italy.
Agnese Marchesi
Biolab, Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università Roma Tre, Rome; Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e dell’Informazione, Università di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale, Cassino (FR), Italy.
Alessio Silvetti
INAIL, Dipartimento di Medicina, Epidemiologia, Igiene del Lavoro ed Ambientale, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy.
Alberto Ranavolo
INAIL, Dipartimento di Medicina, Epidemiologia, Igiene del Lavoro ed Ambientale, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy.
Francesco Draicchio
francesco.draicchio@unicatt.it
INAIL, Dipartimento di Medicina, Epidemiologia, Igiene del Lavoro ed Ambientale, Monte Porzio Catone (RM), Italy.

The study aim is to compare trunk kinematic and L5/S1 level compression, evaluated by a muscle co-activation index, moving a patient from bed to wheelchair and vice versa with two different lifting aids. Seven experienced operators were studied handling an 85 kg surrogated patient from bed to wheelchair using both a floor lift and an overhead lift. Results show that the use of these devices allows a single operator to work safely because the muscle effort and trunk kinematic resulted quite low in all working conditions. These results can be useful for occupational physicians in giving the fit for work judgment to workers having functional limitations.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Engkvist IL. Evaluation of an intervention comprising a no lifting policy in Australian hospitals. Appl Ergon 2006; 37 (suppl 2): 141-8. Santaguida PL, Pierrynowski M, Goldsmith C, Fernie G. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices. Clin Biomech 2005; 20: 906-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.06.001
Marras WS, Knapik GG, Ferguson S. Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of overhead-based and floor-based patient transfer devices. Ergonomics 2009; 5 (suppl 2): 384-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802376075

How to Cite



[Overview of assistance and robotisation systems for operations involving ergonomic risks in the healthcare field]: Overview sui sistemi di ausiliazione e di robotizzazione delle operazioni a rischio ergonomico in ambito sanitario. (2016). Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, 38(3), 247-248. https://doi.org/10.4081/gimle.713
Copyright (c) 2016 The Author(s) Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.